![]() |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Return to Archives go
THE MOUNTAIN OBSERVER
ON-LINE
ISSUES,
PEOPLE, OBJECTS & POLICIES- CLOSE UP
A
FREEWHEELING
CONSERVATIVE COMMENTARY DEDICATED TO THE DEFENSE OF FREEDOM, THE NEXT
GENERATION, AND THE WAY THINGS OUGHT TO BE. TO UNDERSTAND
THIS
NEWSLETTER, IT IS NECESSARY THAT YOU ARE ABLE TO READ AND TO THINK. Updated
occasionally on
this website when I decide to do
it. J.
E.
Sohmer Jefferson, CO Flyover country, where the air
is thin,
the heavens bright, and the hunting and fishing are good. Serious
Considerations: The
marketing of airline
passenger service, as well as the marketing of all transportation
services, has
always fascinated me. I think all the major traditional US
carriers are
walking corpses; it is only a matter of when. Southwest Airlines
is the
model of the future, not only in the US, but around the world.
However, I
think there is another fiasco in waiting, and that would be the new
Airbus A380
Super Jumbo. I think Boeing's pull back from attempting to
compete at
that level will ultimately prove to be a very wise decision. The
future
of the 747, upgraded or otherwise, is murky at best. Smaller fuel
efficient, service, maintenance smart and small airport friendly
aircraft are
where the bucks will be placed for the foreseeable future. The
737 will be
around for a long time. What I think we will witness with
the A380
Airbus will be in many ways a replay of the SST fiasco, including the
fact that
back in the '70's, Boeing made a similar assessment of the economics
and
marketability of such high end aircraft. The A380 is supposed to
remedy
that problem with its huge capacity, so perhaps I am wrong, but I don't
think
so. Very few airports can handle it, or will be able to justify
the
expense of the necessary upgrades; and then there is the security
issue.
A more likely application of this aircraft might be in the cargo
business. Once again, I think Boeing has exercised good
business
judgment, and nixed the temptation of national
hubris. JES The
court battle
continues in Terri Schiavo's battle for life. We watch intently
to see if
there is a judge in Florida willing to order her murder. Stay
tuned. www.terrisfight.org
www.LifeNews.com
JES The
Bush trip to Europe
makes it very clear that we are not going to tolerate a nuclear Iran,
and are
preparing to draw the line. It was clearly the primary purpose of
the
trip to make this point, and to educate Europeans accordingly.
They were
invited to get "onboard", which is to say that failure to do so, and
the consequences thereof, would become an European problem in history
yet to be
written. We are at war with Islamic Fascism, as we ought to be;
those who
fail to understand this are delusional. Americans are not
enthusiastic
about foreign adventure, and properly so. We are not imperialist
by
nature, nor is that our present purpose. Americans do believe in
the
right to defend themselves from threats to hearth and home. So it
is that
we have too patiently endured decades of violent incidents against us
by
Islamic Fascists mistaking our reluctance to respond for
weakness.
However, September 11, 2001 was a step too far. We have, as
President, a
real American, who can cut through the cloud of post modern nonsense
that
pollutes the minds of professors and their journalism students, and who
knows
how to call the bluff of international card sharks. Jocko
Shearock,
Gearhard Showturd and the Iranian mullahs should understand that High
Noon is
approaching fast. In a nuclear age, an age of missiles, shipping
containers, international air travel and the internet, the luxury of
hiding
behind two oceans has disappeared. On the American frontier, is
has
always been unquestioned wisdom that it is best to remove the
rattlesnake's
head before it is necessary to remove its fangs. The fancy word
on the
east coast is preemption. Meanwhile, Americans continue to not be
about
imperialism, but freedom. God Bless cowboys, you know, the
"stupid" ones. JES The
oil embargo is now
officially off Iraq, and Europe will now have to bargain
anew. Yes,
in many ways the decisions about how the international "community"
should have responded to Hussein's Iraq was about oil. European
oil
supply providers, and the pockets of those with personal investments in
the UN
oil for food program, preferred the opportunities of corruption, and to
ignore
the torture. No better case can be made for the termination of
the United
Nations, an organization totally useless and corrupt. France and
Germany
still need oil. Let them now bargain with a Free Iraq, and a
people who
they tried to screw. JES Tsunami
victims continue
to multiply needlessly, not from the original wave, but from the false
pride of
officials invested with political correctness against the use of DDT,
the
hugely successful, and only effective, weapon against malaria spreading
mosquitoes on the loose in the wake of the devastation. Actually
this
problem predates the tsunami by decades, but now the issue is out in
the
open. Another example of Environmentalism run amok. JES Tony
Blankley, there you
go again, wrecking the language. In a recent column in the
Washington
Times: ....."Keep in mind, the Pentagon has not denied the story;
it
has merely said that some of the facts are inaccurate."
...... Damit! if the "facts" are inaccurate, they aren't
"facts", they're allegations, or alleged facts, or
worse. This constant butchering the word fact by a
lot of
people who should know better is driving me to distraction. My
own theory
is that this is a byproduct of post modern deconstructionist
relativism, and it
seems to me that those who consider themselves Conservatives should
know better
than to facilitate their ideological enemies, which is why I think its
an
issue. JES The
President visits
Brussels Belgium to butter up the Brussel Sprouts. Better than
French
cheese. JES On
the matter of Vioxx,
Bextra and Celebrex: Once again, you can feed a 1000 lbs of anything to
a mouse
and kill it. People get a grip; life is not without risk, just
read the
directions. JES The
recently reported
"news" concerning Allen Greenspan's comments to Congress about Social
Security reform are considered by this writer to be no news at
all. To
anybody who has paid any attention what-so-ever to Greenspan and the
more
general debate about national fiscal policy in recent years, his
comments were
totally predictable, and correct. Yes to SS reform by way of
introducing
private sector options, (there are no workable Government options) but
start
slow and proceed deliberately so as not to upset the market.
Anything you
do will carry some measure of risk, but to do nothing eventually will
guarantee
calamity. JES The
President directs
the nomination of Ken Mehlman as the new Chair of the RNC. Ken
Mehlman
comes across to me as a real street fighter, and friendly to the the
Republican
conservative base. He will be the first RNC Chairman under Bush
43 that I
feel good about going in. We shall see.
Meanwhile,
fellow Conservatives, do not get too alarmed by the nomination of Jo
Ann
Davidson of Ohio as co-Chairman. It is a political payoff.
There
are several legitimate hard headed political reasons why this should be
a good
move, including the fact that Ohio must continue to be regarded as a
swing
state going into 2008. Davidson's efforts in 2004 were so
important, that she might have made the difference, while her personal
position
on "choice" helps in the Northeast to inoculate the GOP from any
charge of "extremism" such as the Democrats have fallen for on the
opposite side. I know this drives you nuts, as it does me, but I
don't
think she is any Christie Todd Whitless, and it is not her function to
make, or
even propose, policy. Ken Mehlman is in charge, and it is his job
to
raise money and organize the base. JES We
have more to be
concerned about with the Chairmanship of the Senate Judiciary Committee
of
Arlen Specter. The Mountain Observer considers him to be a snake
in the
grass. What we need in the federal court system is a lot less stare
decisis (the Arlen Specter principle that precedent decisions
are to be
followed by the courts), and a lot more stare reversal
(the
Sohmer principle that a lot of unconstitutional mistakes need to be
fixed). JES On
the domestic front
President Bush is leading off with exactly the right "flagship" issue
with his proposals on Social Security reform. He has caught
Democrats at
a weak point politically on an issue that has traumatized Republicans
for
decades, and his planning and strategy is perfect, dragging along
federal
spending and tort reform in the wake of what is really all the same
decades old
problem of Liberal Statist extortion. If you don't "get it",
I'll be happy to sit down with you and explain it all; it may take some
time. Until recently, I must confess that I never considered the
possibility that all the first term spending might have been a
deliberate
"set up". I still need to be convinced that that was the
deliberate and calculated intention, but at this point, it certainly
could
function as a fulcrum. Democrats, you complain about the deficit,
you
hypocrites who are primarily responsible for this Federal monstrosity
that has
been erected over the last 70 years. Now your political golden
goose
Social Security, Ponzi scheme and fraud that it has always been, will
either
blow up in the face of your children, or be re-formatted by
Conservatives
toward a privatized path of individual self empowerment. The cost
of
conversion, in competition with all the other Federal domestic spending
baggage, will force us all to make choices, a situation not invented by
George
Bush, but to date buried by the public relations of politicians
invested in the
appeal of playing Santa Clause. The problem will not be resolved
by
stalling tax cuts; more tax cuts are called for. Government
funding
problems are the consequence of over-spending on misguided and
un-Constitutional adventures in social and economic engineering, and
the
purchase of votes. With the Generals standing behind
me, and
Congress dismissed, I could fix the deficit problem in 10 minutes;
George W.
Bush is necessarily more subtle, which is why he is President and I am
not, and
boy has he set you up. You may politically defeat his effort, I
am not
making predictions. There are too many soft headed
Republicans
running around loose. One cannot fully appreciate the depth of
the
ideological struggle behind the public debate on social security
reform, so
full of code directed at perceived higher priorities. It is a
life and
death struggle, not intended as a pun, second only to the keystone
issue of
abortion. Remember
this: if what
the President proposes for social security fails to materialize, it
will be
only a matter of time before you come face-to-face with somebody like
myself,
and you will remember George W. Bush fondly, and with sorrow that he
did not
prevail. JES Corrections: None Bush
Score Card: Excellent: Your
perseverance in
Iraq. Hang tough. Your
State of the Union
speech was beyond excellent. The
Iraqi elections were
a success, big time. Congratulations
on the
new tort reform measure that pulls the "class action" stuff up into
the federal court system. This is an excellent start, however,
there are
additional items to be addressed, such as losers pay, for one.
Requiring
lawyers in public to display a warning label on themselves, on the
model of
cigarettes, is recommended. Next
up, making the '03
tax cuts permanent. These things must be made to happen. Not
So Good:
The
thrust of your
immigration and border proposals are all wrong, and beyond repair by
compromise. The arrogance of certain initiatives and proposals of
the
Mexican government in this regard, clearly hostile to, and
disrespectful of our
sovereignty, are unacceptable. You can call amnesty by any other
name; it
is still amnesty. To condone lawbreaking as an initial step to
citizenship is a peculiarity not understood by legal immigrants, or
American
citizens, competing in the marketplace for jobs and incomes. This
business about about "certain jobs Americans won't do" is an unproven
thesis framed on the wishes of those unwilling to pay for an honest
day's
work. The key to untangling this conundrum is to attack, reduce
and
eliminate regulations and tax barriers saddled on employers, including
the
minimum wage, that pervert employment decisions. Perhaps the
price of
lettuce will double; so be it. Perhaps in a properly ordered
market
climate, new technology will be inspired, creating new jobs that do not
now
exist. The
base of the
Conservative movement will walk away from you, if you do not address
these
points. Terrible-
or even worse:
Your
policies and
proposals on immigration and the border, and you have allowed "homeland
security" to be trumped by political correctness, multiculturalism and
a
fear of profiling. The
absence of any
apparent plan or strategy to deal with our balance of payments
problem.
Herein lays the smoking time bomb of the future, and what is really at
the
bottom of the problem with jobs in this country. You
need to get control
of the spending. We need some genuine program cuts, and the
elimination
of some real unnecessary nonsense. You have revealed yourself as
a big
government "Republicrat". STOP THE SPENDING AND SHRINK THE
GOVERNMENT! In your State of the Union speech you promised budget
numbers
below the rate of inflation, which remains to be seen. I do not
doubt the
sincerity of your intentions, and I recognize the limits of political
reality,
but it is not enough. You could test your constitutional
authority,
ultimately, and refuse to release certain funding authorized by
Congress.
Someday, I think this will have to happen, in a big way, and I believe
you
would be on sound Constitutional ground to do so for federal activities
that
are clearly beyond the authority of the Constitution of original intent. Wall
Street & Main
St The
economy continues
its march in the right direction, and tax receipts jump
dramatically. Its
at the macro level of federal fiscal and trade policy that The Mountain
Observer continues its pessimism. The Federal Government is just
too
damned big and out of control, and the political cancer of dependency
too
pervasive for resolution at the ballot box. The whole nation, at
all
economic levels, is addicted to pork. Hewlett-Packard
CEO
Carly Fiorina gets fired. From the outside looking in, my
impression is
that HP's business plan was too broad and unfocused, as in trying to be
everything for everybody and not doing real well at anything, except
printers
and printer ink cartridges. I admired Carly for her grit and
determination in the Compaq merger war, but, of course, there was
always the
question about the real value of a PC maker, already tanking, focused
on making
a product devolving into commodity status. The HP Board itself is
not
exempt from criticism on these matters. So it is probably time
for a
fresh start all the way around. The
Fed apparently plans
to continue ratcheting up interest rates. This may be useful in
terms of
encouraging continued foreign investment in our national debt, which is
to say
that the Fed continues to sidestep the real issue of our balance of
payments
problem. To be fair, this is a matter primarily requiring
Congressional
action, as in STOP SPENDING, and revision of a number of tax laws that
discourage saving and encourage the export of manufacturing.
Meanwhile,
back at the Fed, one wonders at what point will they have taken this
interest
rate thing a step too far. The economy, while headed in the right
direction, is still pretty tender. 2005
Predictions: -By
the end of the year,
Martha Stewart will be back in the saddle and doing well. -U
S Air is history, as
it ought to be, even if it does not yet know it. American
unions
need to wise up. The planes will be re-painted under a different
name,
and may actually continue to fly, where there is a market. -The
Shia will come to
dominate Iraq, not a tough call to make. Less clear will be
establishment
of republican democracy. The best barometer of this experiment
will be
the actions of the Kurds; already Christian Iraqis are taking
flight.
Under any circumstances, Sunnis will face a tough period of redemption,
if that
is even possible. The Shia relationship with Iran (mullahs or
reformers?)
will be the key, and this may turn on the fact that the United States
will not
allow Iran to deploy a nuclear armed missile. How this will
actually work
out is too tough to call, but we need to do our best. Heartland
Rebellion
Update: As
I predicted before it
happened, on November 2, 2004, 12 years late, the American Heartland
really
began to wake up. It still has a way to go. Current
Reading
Recommendations: 1.)
UNDERSTANDING
ANTI-AMERICANISM: ITS ORIGINS AND IMPACT AT HOME AND ABROAD
PAUL HOLLANDER,
ED
IVAN R.
DEE
372
PGS
$28.95 2.)
THE CASE FOR
DEMOCRACY: THE POWER OF FREEDOM TO OVERCOME TYRANNY AND TERROR
NATAN
SHARANSKY
PUBLIC
AFFAIRS 303
PGS $26.95 3.)
RAID ON THE SUN:
INSIDE ISRAEL'S SECRET CAMPAIGN THAT DENIED SADDAM THE BOMB
RODGER W.
CLAIRE
BROADWAY 288
PGS $24.95
God
Bless America
Jim
American
Nationalist
Conservative
Jefferson,
CO 80456 Copyright 2009 South Park Services LLC. All rights Reserved. |