First_Things

09/16/09 An update on the constitutionality issue in the Courts. On September 8^th, Federal judge David Carter, who sits on the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, issued a ruling that tentatively set a court trial date of January 26, 2010 on the issue of Obama’s eligibility for the office of the Presidency. The lawsuit in question has been brought by a string of plaintiffs, represented by attorney Orly Taitz.

Not surprisingly, the Government is attempting to get the case thrown out, which will be considered by the court at a hearing prior to the trial. Roughly, the government’s position is that rulings by the Electoral College trump Congressional oversight and review. Plaintiffs respond “not so”. So on this point, the discussion is over legality issues, not over the objective reality of what actually happened.

Also open is a motion by Taitz to be granted discovery so as to demand release of certain presidential records relevant to the issue of Obama’s constitutional eligibility. Other procedural issues remain to be resolved. Notwithstanding the procedural and jurisdictional questions, the matters of substance remain open before the Court at this time. JES

09/08/09 An Obama birth certificate has surfaced, allegedly from Kenya. Is it real or fake? We have no knowledge, at this point, one way or the other. However, in this case, I have reason to suspect that further investigation is warranted. Go to Obama Certificate? JES
.

08/07/09 On the matter of Obama’s Constitutional eligibility. What we have said here, consistently all along, is that, absent a real birth certificate, the American public really doesn’t know for a fact the answer to the question as to Obama’s real status as an American, legally, by birth. That birth certificate has yet to be produced. Its absence proves nothing, either way; however its absence feeds inquiry into the matter. Except for personal hubris on the part of Mr. Obama, if, in fact he is a legally natural born citizen, there is no rational explanation for withholding release of the actual birth certificate. However, with this regime, rational explanations on many things are in short supply.

Meanwhile, the Mountain Observer has been following the discussion closely, and due to the relevant circumstances to date, can only summarize the matter as it appears to us at this time.

1). While it is still premature to rule the possibility out, a birth in Kenya appears unlikely.

2). While it remains to be legally established, a birth in Hawaii appears to be more likely. Aside from the absence of a genuine birth certificate, however, there appear to be questions surrounding the citizenship status of both his mother and his father at the time. In addition, questions remain unanswered concerning Obama’s citizenship status as it might have been affected by his time in Indonesia, a complicated check list on its own.

Now it is not a matter of cheap partisan politics that all this does matter. It is a matter of defending the American Constitution, much abused by the Left particularly in recent decades. Other behavior by this thugocracy and its supporters since taking control of the levers of government should draw the significance of the birth certificate discussion into better perspective. We will continue to follow this matter closely. JES
.

07/18/09 Obama, and the issue of constitutional eligibility. Attached to all the various theories surrounding this discussion is the question as to why, if he was born in Hawaii, doesn’t he just order release of the proper documentation and end the controversy.

1). Should he do so, together with various travel documents and school records, he might open a Pandora’s box legally polluting his natural born citizenship status, most likely in connection with his time in Indonesia. There are issues in this regard to be examined.

2). Should he do so, together with various travel documents and school records, he might open a Pandora’s box politically by opening up a more broadly public examination of his Islamic links, associations and personal disposition on the matter of radical Islam.

3). However, the Mountain Observer would suggest something entirely different. It is not possible to understand anything Baraka Hussein Obama says or does without understanding the deep, very deep, narcisstic racial hatred of whites, and Christianity, that consumes his life. So it is that, if his legal world was in perfect order on the matter of his constitutional eligibility, from his perspective, for others to raise the question is seen only as an act of racism against himself, to be dismissed as a personal assault against himself, possibly with legal implications. His own manufactured racial pride could be all that stands against a fast and easy resolution of the matter, which is to say, his own narcisstic self trumps the interests of national political comity.

Now, as things currently stand, I don’t think most Americans really understand who and what they have put into the oval office. The eligibility questions can only be fully understood in the larger context of an ongoing cultural, political and economic coup attempt against American civilization. We are faced with the greatest test in our history in what could prove to be the perfect storm against worldwide civilization itself. JES
.

06/01/09 Come on Baraka Hussein Obama, the messiah, President of the world, international ward healer and faker-in-chief, show us your real birth certificate meeting constitutional requirements for the office of the Presidency. I don’t think you will because I don’t think you can. The evidence to date suggests you to be a faker, imposter and a fraud. JES
.

05/19/09 Dr. Orly Taitz has a new website. http://www.orlytaitzesq.com Defend Our Freedoms Foundation 26302 La Paz ste 211, Mission Viejo CA 92691 Copyright 2009. E-mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com . Highly recommended; go to Obama watch for more. JES
.

04/12/09 Now you can read the full story about Dr. Orly Taitz, not just a dumb blond. She has reason to love this country, and take citizenship seriously. You see, she understands communists and tyrants of all stripes. Obama, take note.
Visit: http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=94377 JES
.

04/11/09 The Mountain Observer has never asserted that Obama is ineligible to be president under Article 2, Section 1 of the United States Constitution. What I have asserted, and continue to assert, is that Obama has never established his eligibility under this provision, nor has Congress discharged its responsibilities under Amendment 20, section 3. Huffing and puffing by his political supporters aside, sunlight on this matter is necessary. If it can be constitutionally determined that he is constitutionally qualified, then he is my president. It appears that this remains to be determined. Meanwhile, who is Barry Soetoro? JES
.

04/02/09 Orly Taitz. I trust that you will hang tough, in an era when many men are women and some women are men. JES

03/18/09 If you have not already heard the name, remember Orly Taitz. You may get to know her well; many soldiers already do. JES
.

11/21/08 An e-mail to a friend: Regarding Obama's citizenship. As I understand the situation, some piece of paper, possibly an affidavit, was obtained from someone in Hawaii, alleging that he was born there. Likely insufficient legally; not a genuine certified birth certificate. Even if his birth in Hawaii could be determined to be actual, there are questions as to whether or not this might have been corrupted by dual citizenship during his time in Indonesia, then returning. It all gets quite complex. On top of this, there is alleged to be a video of his grandmother in Kenya, speaking in Swahili, saying that she was present at his birth there. Bottom line is we need to see a genuine legal birth certificate, and he can't, or wont, provide one. I see no legitimate excuse for this confusion. JES
.

11/19/08 We are supposed to be a nation of laws, under a Constitution originally adopted in 1789. A requirement of the Constitution is that Presidents be native/natural born citizens. There are legitimate questions being raised as to whether Baraka Hussein Obama meets this test. So far he has taken steps seemingly designed to proactively deny the public access to those records. His handling of the matter has so far only inflamed suspicions of a "cover-up".

Now the Mountain Observer does not claim any direct knowledge of the facts of the situation. What the Mountain Observer does know, as a matter of fact, is that Baraka Hussein Obama is either a natural born citizen of this country, or he is not. He has both a legal and moral obligation to clarify the matter by authorizing public access to a valid certified original birth certificate, in addition to the paper trail of his goings and comings about the globe, as such documentation is legally necessary to confirm both his original and continuing citizenship as required to support his candidacy for office. Paying fast and loose with the Constitution, a Liberal habit now of many years, is unacceptable. So far, the Liberal Mainstream Media, largely in the sack with Baraka Hussein Obama and in flagrant violation of its own Constitutional responsibilities, has failed to consider the matter. Reportedly, there have been 17 lawsuits filed around the nation in pursuit of greater transparency on the issue. Accordingly, I provide you here with three randomly selected websites on which you might servale the matter for yourself. While it is true that any or all of these sites might represent the views of wackos, it is also possible that they are on to something. Time will tell. The issue is too important to be just "flipped off". JES.
.
11/11/08 The Mountain Observer is not convinced that Baraka Hussein Obama, the messiah, President of the world and international ward healer, is a natural born citizen of the United States, as required by the Constitution. I acknowledge that I might be wrong on this, however it says much about our great national political divide that the question remains open. If Obama is legitimate in this regard, it is within his power to put the issue to rest, and, in fact, it is his obligation, morally and legally, to do so. That he has not, itself invites the question. JES
.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Election Day 2008 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Shouldn't Congress be curious by virtue of its responsibilities under Amendment 20, section 3?